
In an electric circuit with a supplied voltage (emf)
, a resistor with resistance
, and an inductor with reactance
, suppose you want to add a second resistor. If
represents the resistance of this second resistor then the power
delivered to that resistor is given by

with
,
, and
treated as constants. For which value of
is the power
maximized?
extracted from Michael Corral. (2020). Elementary Calculus
Lemma. (quotient rule)
Let
, where both
and
are differentiable and
. The quotient rule states that the derivative of
is

Wikipedia on Quotient Rule
Roughwork.
Defining

and

then

Computing as follows

The mathematically formal way is to show that

But from a physical point of view, assume that the electric currents
passing through every components in series are the same, and the potential difference across each total up to the supplied voltage, namely,

The power
delivered to resistor
is given by the formula

and the only way to maximize
, is to maximize either or both
and
.
Solving for a first-order ordinary differential equation:

deriving current
wrt
, we have

Thus 

(to be continued)
Recall the relation between root mean square (rms) values and peak values:

Recall also that the resistance
of an ideal inductor is zero (
), and that after the circuit has shortly reached steady state (i.e., constant current
anywhere/anytime), the potential difference (
) or voltage drop (
) across the inductor will become zero (
) before long.
Try again,

The derivative test seems inevitable. Maybe you could show that resistance
maximizes power
, simply by drawing a phasor diagram?
(to be continued)