From ,
upon integration it becomes
where .
Similarly one can obtain
,
.
From ,
upon integration it becomes
where .
Similarly one can obtain
,
.
Exercise 4.6.1. Use a similar approach (involving renaming indices and grouping like terms) to prove equation 4.20.
Eq. (4.20):
Eq. (4.10):
Then,
The Schwarzschild metric is given by Eq. (9.3):
whereas the metric for spherical coordinates in flat spacetime is given by Eq. (9.2):
Along a purely radial worldline ,
and
, of the Schwarzschild metric will become
.
Now that the Schwarzschild radius is
, there is Eq. (9.15):
.
The total radial distance between two events differing only by -coordinates, i.e.,
and
is calculated by definite integration, given by Eq. (9.16):
Trying binomial approximation:
then,
Considering only first-order approximation:
.
Upon integration, there is Eq. (9.17):
Eq. (14.7):
Let Eq.(14.8):
From the event horizon to
, it corresponds to
and
.
From , by quotient rule:
,
and
.
Substituting these into Eq. (14.7), I get Eq. (14.9):
Eq. (14.9):
Since the indefinite integral evaluated by Eq. (14.10):
and the identity given by Eq. (14.11):
are combined to give
.
From ,
.
and it checks with Eq. (14.3):
.
Check that the physical distance from to
is indeed
. (If your calculator cannot handle inverse hyperbolic functions, use equation 14.11 to eliminate
.)
Eq. (14.3):
and the identity given by Eq. (14.11):
are combined to give the following
which measures the physical distance from the event horizon
.
Now that , the physical distance will be
Eq. (8.41):
Eq. (8.42):
Integrating on Eq. (8.42) gives Eq. (8.43):
.
The definition of pathlength along the curve is given by Eq. (8.16):
.
Previously to Exercise 8.5.2., the metric tensor is given by Eq. (8.40):
.
Eq. (8.45) begins:
and this is Eq. (8.46).
Write out the implied sum in for
and show that it is equivalent to the
component of equation (4.22) at low velocities.
Eq. (4.22):
Eq. (4.15):
the electromagnetic field tensor of which is given by Eq. (4.14):
and the Minkowski metric tensor of which is given by Eq. (4.6):
In the case , beginning with Eq. (4.15):
The electrostatic force acting on the charge
at
due to another charge
at
is given by Coulomb’s Law:
,
whereas the electrostatic force due to another charge
at
is given similarly by:
.
When a fourth charge is placed on
, which is at a distance of
from
where
is the side length of the square, the magnitude of electrostatic force
is given by:
.
The electrostatic force is then given by:
When the net electrostatic force acting on position is in the left direction only, by summing over the above-calculated three forces, i.e.,
the vertical component of the electrostatic force must be zero, i.e.,
And the answer is E.