If
and
where
and
are both acute angles, find, without using tables or a calculator,
(a)
,
(b)
,
(c)
.
Extracted from J. F. Talbert & H. H. Heng. (1995). Additional Mathematics Pure and Applied (6e).
Roughwork.
(a)
Not yet to approach a solution, I wish to get a feel of the problem from three perspectives— i. algebraic, ii. geometric, and iii. differential:
(i. algebraic)

(ii. geometric)

(iii. differential)
Let
. Then, recall that

because of Taylor series/expansion of a function
at some point
:

such that in our situation, you know, we have
(the Maclaurin series):

Now that we have enough, here begins the
Solution.
(i. algebraic)

(ii. geometric)


(iii. differential)
That angles
and
are acute angles, i.e.,

does not imply
is also an acute angle, but that
.

© 2010 Geek3 / GNU-FDL, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sine_cosine_one_period.svg
such that

Letting
,
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \begin{aligned} &\quad \textrm{Area under curve }f(x)\textrm{ in }x\in [0,A+B] \\ & = \int_{0}^{A+B}f(x)\,\mathrm{d}x \\ & = \int_{0}^{A+B}\sin (x)\,\mathrm{d}x \\ & = \big[-\cos x\big]_{0}^{A+B} \\ & = 1-\cos (A+B) \\ \end{aligned}](https://physicspupil.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-7a1ffee415130e89327242e3b074b258_l3.svg)
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \begin{aligned} &\quad \textrm{Area under curve }f(x)\textrm{ in }x\in [0,A] \\ & = \int_{0}^{A}f(x)\,\mathrm{d}x \\ & = \int_{0}^{A}\sin (x)\,\mathrm{d}x \\ & = \big[-\cos x\big]_{0}^{A} \\ & = 1-\cos A \\ & = 1-\frac{4}{5} \\ & = \frac{1}{5} \\ \end{aligned}](https://physicspupil.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-539b5472307c7cc30ca70e73257bde59_l3.svg)
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \begin{aligned} &\quad \textrm{Area under curve }f(x)\textrm{ in }x\in [0,B] \\ & = \int_{0}^{B}f(x)\,\mathrm{d}x \\ & = \int_{0}^{B}\sin (x)\,\mathrm{d}x \\ & = \big[-\cos x\big]_{0}^{B} \\ & = 1-\cos B \\ & = 1-\frac{12}{13} \\ & = \frac{1}{13} \\ \end{aligned}](https://physicspupil.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-80e157f252926927bc32bfe2e5d71e7a_l3.svg)
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \begin{aligned} &\quad \textrm{Area under curve }f(x)\textrm{ in }x\in [B,A] \\ & = \frac{1}{5}-\frac{1}{13} \\ & = \frac{8}{65} \\ \end{aligned}](https://physicspupil.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-4ff65c8583fe1e9bd19789a38205903b_l3.svg)
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \begin{aligned} &\quad \textrm{Area under curve }f(x)\textrm{ in }x\in [A,A+B] \\ & = 1-\cos (A+B) - \frac{1}{5} \\ & = \frac{4}{5}-\cos (A+B) \\ \end{aligned}](https://physicspupil.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-22b5f5363bb4bbdb21f88deb72538268_l3.svg)
then letting
, and noting in a right-angled triangle the cosine of an angle admits of no negative values, so can it further be said

I lost my way…
Let
be the difference in degrees between time-varying angles
and
where assumed is
without loss of generality.

Taking partial derivatives wrt
,
,
, and
:


I lost my faith…
If

then
.
By equality
it states that the output value
of
is determined by input values of two arguments
;
by equality
that the output value
of
is determined by input values
, i.e., by one significant argument
, and another trivial argument
; and
by equality
that the output value
of
is determined by input values
, i.e., by one trivial argument
, and another significant argument
.
Hence, assuming a partial variation

we WTS the following

LHS:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \begin{aligned} &\quad\enspace \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\sin (\texttt{var1}+\texttt{var2}) \\ & = \big[\cos (\texttt{var1}+\texttt{var2})\big] (\texttt{var1}'+\texttt{var2}') \\ \end{aligned}](https://physicspupil.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-58fec73a7a10caf999d02267e803b8e9_l3.svg)
RHS:

and LHS=RHS implies:

(to be continued)