202101141547 Homework 1 (Q5)

Let G=\mathbb{Z}_2.

(a) Describe all the elements in \mathrm{Perm}(G) and the maps l_a for a\in \mathbb{Z}_2. Is l surjective? (Use the notation \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix} to denote the map sending from 0 to 1 and from 1 to 0.)

(b) Repeat part (a) for the group G=\mathbb{Z}_3.


Setup.

\textrm{Perm}(X) is the set of all bijective maps from X to itself. And the group (\textrm{Perm}(X),\circ ) is the group where \circ is the composition of maps.

l:G\rightarrow \textrm{Perm}(G),\enspace a\mapsto l_a\qquad \forall\, a\in G

is the group embedding of G into \textrm{Perm}(G), where

l_a:G\rightarrow G,\enspace g\mapsto ag\qquad g\in G

is the left translation of G.


(a)

Thus, the elements of \textrm{Perm}(\mathbb{Z}_2) are altogether the following bijections:

\begin{aligned} & \\ [0] & \mapsto [0] \\ [1] & \mapsto [1] \end{aligned}

and

\begin{aligned} & \\ [0] & \mapsto [1] \\ [1] & \mapsto [0] \end{aligned},

or equivalently, in matrices,

\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} and \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}

The left translation l_0 is

l_0:\mathbb{Z}_2\rightarrow\mathbb{Z}_2,\enspace g\mapsto 0g\qquad g\in\{ 0,1\}= \mathbb{Z}_2

But [0]+[0]=[0]\quad (\mathrm{mod}\,2) and [0]+[1]=[1]\quad (\mathrm{mod}\,2),
hence in matrix l_0 is \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix}.

The left translation l_1 is

l_1:\mathbb{Z}_2\rightarrow\mathbb{Z}_2,\enspace g\mapsto 1g\qquad g=\{ 0,1\}\in \mathbb{Z}_2

But [1]+[0]=[1]\quad (\mathrm{mod}\,2) and [1]+[1]=[0]\quad (\mathrm{mod}\,2),
hence in matrix l_1 is \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}.

It is hence checked that the range of the left translations l_0, l_1 is inside (or, more precisely, equal to) the codomain \textrm{Perm}(\mathbb{Z}_2)

Then, I can say l:\mathbb{Z}_2\rightarrow\mathrm{Perm}(\mathbb{Z}_2), the mappings of which are explicitly the following two:

0\mapsto \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} and 1\mapsto \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix};

by the definition l(a): a\mapsto l_a\qquad \forall\, a\in\{ [0],[1]\}=\mathbb{Z}_2.

Recall that a function is said to be surjective if the range of function constitutes its whole codomain. Thus, l is surjective.


(b)

Let G=\mathbb{Z}_3(=\{ [0],[1],[2] \}).

All the one-to-one mappings are listed as follows:

\textrm{Perm}(\mathbb{Z}_3)=\Bigg\{ \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 2 \\ \end{pmatrix},\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ 2 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \\ 2 & 2 \\ \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 \\ 2 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 \\ 1 & 0 \\ 2 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 \\ 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}\Bigg\}.

First, the left translation l_0 is

l_0:\mathbb{Z}_3\rightarrow\mathbb{Z}_3,\enspace g\mapsto 0g\qquad g\in\{ 0,1,2\}=\mathbb{Z}_3

Since [0]+[0]=[0]\quad (\mathrm{mod}\,3), [0]+[1]=[1]\quad (\mathrm{mod}\,3), and [0]+[2]=[2]\quad (\mathrm{mod}\,3), I may write

l_0=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 2 \\ \end{pmatrix}.

Secondly, the left translation l_1 is

l_1:\mathbb{Z}_3\rightarrow\mathbb{Z}_3,\enspace g\mapsto 1g\qquad g\in\{ 0,1,2\}=\mathbb{Z}_3

Since [1]+[0]=[1]\quad (\mathrm{mod}\,3), [1]+[1]=[2]\quad (\mathrm{mod}\,3), and [1]+[2]=[0]\quad (\mathrm{mod}\,3), I may write

l_1=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 \\ 2 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}.

Thirdly and lastly, the left translation l_2 is

l_2:\mathbb{Z}_3\rightarrow\mathbb{Z}_3,\enspace g\mapsto 2g\qquad g\in\{ 0,1,2\}=\mathbb{Z}_3

Since [2]+[0]=[2]\quad (\mathrm{mod}\,3), [2]+[1]=[0]\quad (\mathrm{mod}\,3), and [2]+[2]=[1]\quad (\mathrm{mod}\,3), I may write

l_2=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 \\ 1 & 0 \\ 2 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix}.

To sum up what is up till now, l_a=\Bigg\{ \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 2 \\ \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 \\ 2 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 \\ 1 & 0 \\ 2 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix}\Bigg\}

Then, I can say l:\mathbb{Z}_3\rightarrow\mathrm{Perm}(\mathbb{Z}_3), the mappings of which are explicitly the following three:

0\mapsto \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 2 \\ \end{pmatrix}, 1\mapsto \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 \\ 2 & 0\\ \end{pmatrix}, and 2\mapsto\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 \\ 1 & 0 \\ 2 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix}.

by the definition l(a): a\mapsto l_a\qquad \forall\, a\in\{ [0],[1],[2]\}=\mathbb{Z}_2.

l in the case of \mathbb{Z}_3 is \textrm{\scriptsize NOT} surjective because in the codomain \mathbb{Z}_3, the following three elements

\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 \\ 2 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix}, \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \\ 2 & 2 \\ \end{pmatrix}, and \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 \\ 1 & 1 \\ 2 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}

are not inside the range of l.

202101141538 Homework 1 (Q4)

\phi :G_1\rightarrow G_2 is said to be a group embedding if it is an injective group homomorphism.

For a group G and a\in G, we define the left translation of G by a

l_a:G\rightarrow G, g\mapsto ag,\qquad g\in G.

Thus l is a mapping from a value into a function of the value.

I would like to first check that l is a homomorphism,

i.e., l(a_1a_2)=l(a_1)l(a_2).

\begin{aligned} \textrm{LHS} & = l(a_1a_2)\\ & =l_{a_1a_2}(g)\qquad\qquad (g\in G)\\ & = a_1a_2g\qquad\qquad (a_1,a_2\in G)\\ & = l_{a_1}(l_{a_2}(g))\\ & =(l_{a_1}\circ l_{a_2})(g)\qquad\qquad (\circ\,\textrm{as the operation in }\textrm{Perm}(G))\\ & = (l_{a_1}l_{a_2})(g)\\ & = l(a_1)l(a_2)\\ & = \textrm{RHS}\\ \end{aligned}

\therefore l is a homomorphism.

Secondly, I would like to check that l is injective.

If l(a_1)\neq l(a_2), or l_{a_1}(g)\neq l_{a_2}(g), or, a_1g\neq a_2g for a_1,a_2, g\in G, then a_1gg^{-1}\neq a_2gg^{-1} guaranteed that the inverse of g always exists in G. It follows that a_1\neq a_2.

\therefore l is injective.

In conclusion, l is a group embedding.

202101141527 Homework 2 (Q3)

Let G be a group and e\neq a\in G in which e is the identity of G. Suppose \mathrm{ord}(a)=n.

i. If a^h=e, show that n\big| h.

ii. Evaluate the order of a^m where m is an integer.

iii. Show that |H|=n/(m,n) if G=\langle a\rangle and H=\langle a^m\rangle where m\in\mathbb{N}.

iv. If G is cyclic of order n, show that for any d\big| n, there exists a subgroup of order d in G. Could G have more than one subgroup of order d? (Clearly the answer is no if d=1 or n.) Justify with a proof (if you think yes) or give a counterexample (if you think no).


Attempts.

i. By Division Algorithm, h=qn+r for some q\in\mathbb{Z} and 0\le r<n. Then one may write a^r=a^{h-qn}=a^h(a^n)^{-q}=e. It can be seen that r must be 0 lest a^r=e where 1\le r<n contradicts to the assumption that n=\mathrm{ord}(a) where n is the smallest positive integer such that a^n=e. Thus h=qn, and n|h.

ii. First, (a^m)^{\frac{n}{(n,m)}}=a^{\frac{mn}{(n,m)}}=(a^n)^{\frac{m}{(n,m)}}=e^{\frac{m}{(n,m)}}=e. Secondly, if k\in\mathbb{N} such that (a^m)^k=e, from the result of part i. previously, it follows that \frac{n}{(n,m)}|k because if a|bc and (a,b)=1, then a|c (here a=\frac{n}{(n,m)}), b=\frac{m}{(n,m)}, and c=k. Such a k will always be greater than or equal to \frac{n}{(n,m)}. Thus \mathrm{ord}(a^m)=\frac{n}{(n,m)}.

iii. If H=\langle a^m\rangle then |H|=\mathrm{ord}(a^m)\stackrel{\textrm{by (ii)}}{=}\frac{n}{(n,m)}.

iv. Let G=\langle a\rangle as it is cyclic. Let m=n/d where d|n is given in the problem. The order of the cyclic subgroup \langle a^m\rangle of G is then \frac{n}{(n,m)}=\frac{n}{m}=d, in view of the result in part iii. We have constructed a subgroup of order d in \langle a\rangle where d|n.

We wish to prove that it is unique: If H is a subgroup of G=\langle a\rangle and |H|=d, then H=\langle a^{\frac{n}{d}}\rangle. Note that H=\langle a^m\rangle and \frac{n}{(n,m)}=d. Consider the subgroup \langle a^{\frac{n}{d}}\rangle. Because \frac{n}{d}=(n,m) divides m, we have a^m\in \langle a^{\frac{n}{d}}\rangle and thus H\subset \langle a^{\frac{n}{d}}\rangle. From the result of part iii. it follows that |\langle a^{\frac{n}{d}}\rangle | =\frac{n}{(n,\frac{n}{d})}=d. Thus H=\langle a^{\frac{n}{d}}\rangle is unique.

202101141501 Homework 2 (Q1)

Let H be a subset of the group G. Show that H is a subgroup of G if and only if H\neq \emptyset and gh^{-1}\in H whenever g,h\in H.


Attempts.

(only-if part) If H is a subgroup of G, then H must contain the identity e and both x^{-1} and xy is inside H whenever x,y\in H. Thus H\neq \emptyset and for any g,h\in H, h^{-1} is inside H. Thus gh^{-1}\in H.

(if-part) First, because H\neq \emptyset, there exists some x in H such that e=xx^{-1}\in H (by the condition gh^{-1}\in H whenever g,h\in H). This proves the existence of the identity. Secondly, having proven e is in H, and noted that x^{-1}=ex^{-1}\in H whenever e,x\in H, one proves the existence of the inverse. Thirdly, x,y\in H implies xy\in H because y\in H\Rightarrow y^{-1}\in H and also xy=x(y^{-1})^{-1}. H is therefore a subgroup of G.

202004240713 Homework 1 (Q3)

Suppose G be a finite group of even order. Prove that there exists an element a\in G such that a\neq e and a^2=e.


Attempts.

Try negating the statement by the following:

\forall\, a\in G, either a=e or a^2\neq e,

then looking for contradiction to the assumption that G should be a finite group of even order.


CASE 1: Would it be possible that a=e?

Given so, the inverse and the identity of G would be e. And the set G would have contained e only, i.e., the singleton set G=\{ e\}. This contradicts with the assumption that its order be even.

CASE 2: If for all elements in the group G, their order cannot ever be 2.

If a^2\neq e, then a\neq a^{-1} for all a\in G. It would then become an ill-posited negation, because the identity element e is one of all a\in G, and both statements e^2\neq e and e\neq e^{-1} are abhorrent to the basic axioms of a group. So perhaps to my discretion e should be precluded from a‘s, and understood as one (e=e^{-1}) member apart from the other members.

Proceeding to observe that if a\neq a^{-1} for all a\in G, I may then construct a pair of a_i and a_i^{-1} for i\in \{ 1,2,\dots ,n:n\in\mathbb{Z}^+\}, provided from the definition of a group that the inverse of each element must exist and, as it follows, that it must be unique. That is, if a_5=a_{27}^{-1}, I may relabel a_{27} as a_5^{-1}. By such a construction I can guarantee that all elements, except the identity e, are now in pairs.

One therefore, by counting in total how many elements there are in group G, will get an odd number (2n+1), the 2n counted from the pairs, and the single 1 the identity e itself alone counts.

This contradicts with the assumption that |G| be of even parity.

From the negation of statement arises contradiction, the original statement is therefore proven by contradiction.

Remark.

I could not prove otherwise than loosely to so naive myself. Not until I had survived mathematical rigor.

202004240630 Homework 1 (Q2)

Call G a group and e the identity of G. If the order of G is 2, then a^2=e for all a\in G and G is abelian (Prove it yourself). Show that

G is abelian if a^2=e for all a\in G.

Give an example of such a group whose order is greater than 2.


Solution.

Recall that a group G is said to be abelian if xy=yx for all x,y\in G.

For any a,b\in G, there is ab=(bb^{-1})ab(a^{-1}a), because a group satisfies, first, the inverse axiom xx^{-1}=x^{-1}x=e under the notation x^{-1} being the inverse of x, and secondly, the identity axiom ex=xe=x.

Thence by (associativity axiom) x*(y*z)=(x*y)*z I may change brackets and obtain as follows:

\begin{aligned} ab & =(bb^{-1})ab(a^{-1}a) \\ & =b(b^{-1}a)(ba^{-1})a \\ & =b(b^{-1}a)(b^{-1}a)^{-1}a \end{aligned}

Provided that a^2=e for all a\in G, one may deduce a=a^{-1}, b=b^{-1}, etc. Thus,

ab=b(b^{-1}a)(b^{-1}a)a

In addition (b^{-1}a)(b^{-1}a)=(b^{-1}a)^2=e, hence ab=ba, and G abelian.

The product group \mathbb{Z}_2\times \mathbb{Z}_2 is an example of one abelian group whose order is greater than 2 and the order of whose elements is 2.

202004240606 Homework 1 (Q1)

Let G=\{ a,b,c,d\} and the Cayley table of G be

\begin{aligned} * \quad | &\textrm{} \quad a &\textrm{}\quad b \quad &\textrm{}\quad c &\textrm{}\quad d \\ \hline a \quad | &\quad a &\quad b \quad &\quad c &\quad d \\ b \quad | &\quad b &\quad a \quad &\quad c &\quad d \\ c \quad | &\quad c &\quad b \quad &\quad a &\quad d \\ d \quad | &\quad d &\quad d \quad &\quad b &\quad c \end{aligned}

Is (G,*) a group?


Attempts.

I recall that a group (G,*) is a set G altogether with an operation *:G\times G\rightarrow G, (x,y)\mapsto x*y such that the following axioms be satisfied:

i. (Associativity) (x*y)*z=x*(y*z);

ii. (Identity) There exists e\in G such that e*x=x*e=x for all x\in G; and

iii. (Inverse) For each a\in G, there exists b\in G such that a*b=b*a=e.


Let me check them one by one.

i. For x,y,z\in \{ a,b,c,d \}, it suffices to check 4\times 4\times 4=64 operations. And I found that the following operation failed axiom (i):

d*(c*b)=d*b=d but (d*c)*b=b*b=a.

That said, G under the operation * is not a group.

ii. By inspection, the identity of G exists, and that is a because a*x=x*a=x for all x\in \{ a,b,c,d\}. Axiom (ii) is thus satisfied.

iii. There exists d\in G, such that for all x^i\in\{ a,b,c,d\}=G,

d*x^i=x^i*d\neq a.

The claim above is validated by simply checking the identity found to be a in part ii. cannot be found in the entries, and by the fact that a is unique.


Axioms i. and iii. having been failed, I may conclude that G under the operation * cannot form a group.