Let and the Cayley table of
be
Is a group?
Attempts.
I recall that a group is a set
altogether with an operation
,
such that the following axioms be satisfied:
i. (Associativity) ;
ii. (Identity) There exists such that
for all
; and
iii. (Inverse) For each , there exists
such that
.
Let me check them one by one.
i. For , it suffices to check
operations. And I found that the following operation failed axiom (i):
but
.
That said, under the operation
is not a group.
ii. By inspection, the identity of exists, and that is
because
for all
. Axiom (ii) is thus satisfied.
iii. There exists , such that for all
,
.
The claim above is validated by simply checking the identity found to be in part
ii. cannot be found in the entries, and by the fact that is unique.
Axioms i. and iii. having been failed, I may conclude that under the operation
cannot form a group.
