202402051319 Pastime Exercise 009

The blogger claims no originality of his problem below.


On a rollover road,

a vehicle performs circular motion:

Discuss how the driver could prevent a traffic accident.


Roughwork.

Take positive both, the angle \theta in an anti-clockwise direction, and the displacement \mathbf{s} in a rightward and an upward direction.

\begin{aligned} \mathbf{W} & = m\mathbf{g} = -mg\,\hat{\mathbf{j}} \\ \mathbf{N}(\theta ) & = -N(\theta )\,\hat{\mathbf{r}} \\ \mathbf{N}(\theta ) & = N_x(\theta )\,\hat{\mathbf{i}} + N_y(\theta )\,\hat{\mathbf{j}} \\ N^2(\theta ) & = N_x^2(\theta )+N_y^2(\theta ) \\ N_x(\theta ) & = N\sin\theta \\ N_y(\theta ) & = N\cos\theta \\ \mathbf{f}(\theta ) & = -\mu N(\theta )\,\hat{\boldsymbol{\theta}} \\ \mathbf{f}(\theta ) & \perp \mathbf{N}(\theta ) \\ \end{aligned}

In order for the vehicle not to leave the track, the radius of curvature r \textrm{\scriptsize{MUST}} be kept constant, i.e., r=R(=\textrm{Const.}).

Recall, in uniform circular motion there isn’t any (angular) acceleration in angular velocity, i.e.,

\begin{aligned} \alpha (t) & = 0 \\ \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\big(\omega (t)\big) & = 0 \\ \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\bigg( \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\big(\theta (t)\big)\bigg) & = 0 \\ \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\big(\theta (t)\big) & = a \\ \theta (t) & = at+b\qquad (\exists\, a,b\in\mathbb{R}) \\ \end{aligned}

If uniform circular motion is \textrm{\scriptsize{NOT}} assumed,

i.e., \alpha \neq 0\textrm{ \scriptsize{OR} }r\neq\textrm{Const.},

then angular displacement \theta (t) wrt time t will be a polynomial in an indeterminate t of degree 2 or higher,

i.e., O(t)=O(t^c)\qquad\exists\, c\, (\in\mathbb{Z}^+)\geqslant 2.

Angular acceleration \boldsymbol{\alpha} is less often mentioned than is its parallel tangential acceleration \mathbf{a}_{\parallel}\, (=r\boldsymbol{\alpha}) as the pair to centripetal (/centrifugal) acceleration \mathbf{a}_{\perp}.

By Newton 2nd Law, write

\begin{aligned} \mathbf{F}_{\textrm{net}} & = m\mathbf{a} \\ \mathbf{W}+\mathbf{N}+\mathbf{f} & = m(\mathbf{a}_{\parallel}+\mathbf{a}_{\perp}) \\ \end{aligned}

The presence of a centripetal acceleration, i.e., \exists\,\mathbf{a}_{\perp}\neq\mathbf{0}, is necessary for any circular motion, be it uniform or not; but not sufficient for the absence of a tangential acceleration \forall\,\mathbf{a}_{\parallel}= 0 (why?). One knows instinctively, that the vehicle should possess a minimum angular speed \min (\omega ) to do this dangerous stunt. And so much the better if beyond this bound \min (\omega )\leqslant \omega \leqslant \max (\omega ) \ll c one has all degrees of freedom.

By definition,

\begin{aligned} \mathbf{a}_{\parallel} & = R\dot{\omega}\,\hat{\boldsymbol{\theta}} = R\ddot{\theta}\,\hat{\boldsymbol{\theta}} \\ \mathbf{a}_{\perp} & = -R\omega^2\,\hat{\mathbf{r}} = -R\dot{\theta}^2\,\hat{\mathbf{r}} \\ \end{aligned}

Stepping on and off the accelerator (/gas pedal), however delicately, is \textrm{\scriptsize{NOT}} designed to keep a constant acceleration for the gear.


This problem is not to be attempted.