About the graph below, tell some stories as probable as probable can be.

Roughwork.
Assuming linear (/rectilinear) motion in a single direction.
Assuming uniform acceleration, there are two cases: i.
zero acceleration and ii.
non-zero (constant) acceleration; in the former velocity being (a)
constant and the latter (b)
non-constant.
Assuming a flat spacetime metric of which the spatial part does not expands with the temporal part.
Imagine a man walking along a straight line from point
to point
. From

as the path is fixed, i.e.,
, we see speed
and time 

in an inverse relationship. As the man keeps his own fair pace and makes himself a good timekeeper, we can treat speed
as an independent variable, and time
a dependent variable.
: velocity being constant
Parameterize the Cartesian equation
by the parameter
(*as distinguished from the natural/unit-speed/arc-length parameter time
) so as to write a set of parametric equations:


: velocity being non-constant
The man begins with initial speed
at start point
and ends with final speed
at finish point
. We have

Write by SUVAT equations of motion:

Is this time
also a natural parameter?
For a given parametric curve, the natural parametrization is unique up to a shift of parameter.
Wikipedia on Differentiable curve
(to be continued)